Bringing Beneficence, Respect for Persons, and Justice Together in Practice

Why share? With so many voices clamouring for our attention with all things AI, I must first state that my voice is that of a patient who lived through a sentinel event. I have seen how AI could have prevented my event and could have sped up my recovery. After earning over 31 medical and technical certifications in AI from respected organizations like Stanford, Johns Hopkins, Google, Wharton, and more, I saw that my vision could be a reality and that I had a unique voice to share. A voice that combined technology training, deep marketing communications understanding, and lived experience. This research paper, along with others I've shared, focuses on creating best practices that address organizational goals, data governance, and drive real change. I'd love your comments and observations. Please don't hesitate to reach out so we can discuss your thoughts and observations.

The Bottom Line Up Front: Healthcare organizations need a systematic approach to implement ethical AI that integrates beneficence, respect for persons, and justice throughout the entire AI lifecycle. This requires dedicated governance structures, clear policies, ongoing training, and continuous monitoring. Organizations that implement comprehensive AI governance frameworks report 340% higher stakeholder trust and average savings of $12.4M from prevented incidents.

After exploring Beneficence (maximizing good while minimizing harm), Respect for Persons (honoring autonomy and protecting the vulnerable), and Justice (ensuring fair distribution of AI's benefits and risks), the question becomes: How do healthcare organizations actually put these principles into practice?

The answer lies in creating integrated governance frameworks that embed these ethical principles into every stage of AI development, deployment, and monitoring. This isn't just about compliance - it's about building sustainable competitive advantage through ethical innovation.

The Integration Challenge: Why Three Principles Work Better Together

Healthcare AI ethics isn't about choosing between beneficence, autonomy, and justice - it's about achieving a dynamic balance between all three. Recent research in healthcare AI governance demonstrates that organizations attempting to address these principles in isolation often fail to achieve meaningful ethical outcomes.

Consider a real-world example: An AI sepsis prediction system might excel at beneficence by correctly identifying at-risk patients 85% of the time. But if it doesn't respect patient autonomy by providing clear explanations of its recommendations, or if it systematically underperforms for certain ethnic groups (violating justice), the overall ethical framework fails.

The Power of Integration: When healthcare organizations design AI systems that simultaneously optimize for all three principles, they create synergistic effects. Transparent AI systems (respecting autonomy) that include diverse training data (advancing justice) actually perform better clinically (enhancing beneficence) because they're more robust and generalizable.

The STRIDE Framework: A Comprehensive Approach

Based on analysis of successful AI governance implementations across healthcare organizations, I propose the STRIDE framework for ethical AI implementation:

S - Structure (Governance Foundation)
T - Training (Education and Capacity Building)
R - Risk Management (Ongoing Assessment and Mitigation)
I - Integration (Workflow and Systems Integration)
D - Data Governance (Ethical Data Practices)
E - Evaluation (Continuous Monitoring and Improvement)

Structure: Building the Governance Foundation

AI Governance Committee: Establish a dedicated committee with clear authority and diverse representation, including:

• Chief Medical Officer or designee (clinical leadership)
• Chief Information Officer or Chief Technology Officer (technical expertise)
• Chief Ethics Officer or bioethicist (ethical oversight)
• Data Privacy Officer (regulatory compliance)
• Patient advocate or community representative (patient voice)
• Diversity, equity, and inclusion specialist (justice perspective)

Committee Responsibilities:

• Oversee AI project approval and prioritization
• Develop organizational AI policies and procedures
• Monitor AI system performance and ethical compliance
• Investigate AI-related incidents and implement corrective actions
• Provide regular reports to executive leadership and board

Clear Accountability Structure: Define roles and responsibilities throughout the organization, from C-suite executives to frontline clinicians using AI tools.

Training: Building AI Literacy Across the Organization

Tiered Training Approach:

Executive Leadership: Strategic AI governance, ethical decision-making frameworks, regulatory landscape, and business case for ethical AI

AI Governance Committee: Deep dive into ethical frameworks, risk assessment methodologies, bias detection tools, and incident response protocols

Clinical Staff: AI tool functionality, interpretation of AI outputs, maintaining clinical judgment, recognizing potential biases, and patient communication about AI use

Technical Staff: Ethical AI development practices, bias testing and mitigation, explainable AI techniques, and privacy-preserving technologies

Support Staff: Basic AI literacy, privacy and security protocols, and escalation procedures for AI-related concerns

Risk Management: Proactive Assessment and Mitigation

Pre-Implementation Assessment:

• Conduct thorough risk assessments for each AI project using standardized tools
• Evaluate potential impacts on beneficence, autonomy, and justice
• Require diverse stakeholder input, including patient representatives
• Establish performance benchmarks across different demographic groups

Ongoing Monitoring:

• Implement continuous performance monitoring with automated alerts for performance degradation
• Conduct regular equity audits to identify potential disparities
• Track patient complaints and satisfaction related to AI-supported care
• Monitor for "algorithmic drift" where system performance changes over time

Integration: Seamless Workflow Implementation

Clinical Decision Support Integration:

• Design AI tools to enhance, not replace, clinical judgment
• Provide clear explanations of AI recommendations in clinical language
• Enable easy override mechanisms with required documentation
• Integrate alerts for high-risk or unusual recommendations

Patient Communication Protocols:

• Develop standard scripts for explaining AI use to patients
• Create patient-friendly educational materials about AI in healthcare
• Establish consent processes for AI-supported care
• Implement feedback mechanisms for patient concerns

Data Governance: Ethical Data Practices

Inclusive Data Collection:

• Actively recruit diverse populations for AI training datasets
• Partner with community organizations to reach underrepresented groups
• Implement data quality standards that include representation metrics
• Address historical biases in existing datasets

Privacy and Security:

• Implement privacy-preserving AI techniques where appropriate
• Establish clear data sharing agreements and usage restrictions
• Provide patients with transparency and control over their data use
• Regular security audits and vulnerability assessments

Evaluation: Continuous Improvement

Performance Metrics:

• Track clinical outcomes across all patient populations
• Monitor patient satisfaction and trust measures
• Assess workflow efficiency and clinician satisfaction
• Measure compliance with ethical guidelines and regulatory requirements

Regular Review Cycles:

• Quarterly AI governance committee reviews of all active AI systems
• Annual comprehensive audits of AI governance framework effectiveness
• Biannual updates to policies and procedures based on emerging best practices
• Ongoing stakeholder feedback collection and integration

Real-World Success Stories

Atlantic Health System has implemented a two-part AI governance process that balances security and privacy concerns with clinical impact assessment. Their integrated approach includes both technical security teams and diverse clinical committees, resulting in faster, more informed AI adoption decisions.

Canadian Healthcare Implementation: A recent case study using the People, Process, Technology, and Operations (PPTO) framework demonstrated successful AI governance implementation at a large hospital system. The organization successfully established policies and formed an AI governance committee that balanced innovation with safety, achieving organizational buy-in across diverse stakeholders.

Technology Solutions: Organizations are leveraging tools like the HITRUST AI Assurance Program, which provides comprehensive frameworks for AI risk management that promote transparency, accountability, and collaboration while protecting patient privacy.

Implementation Roadmap: Getting Started

Months 1-2: Foundation Setting

• Assemble AI governance committee
• Conduct organizational AI readiness assessment
• Develop preliminary policies and procedures
• Begin leadership training program

Months 3-4: Infrastructure Development

• Implement AI auditing and monitoring tools
• Establish data governance protocols
• Create training materials for different stakeholder groups
• Pilot governance processes with one AI project

Months 5-6: Rollout and Refinement

• Expand governance oversight to additional AI projects
• Launch organization-wide training program
• Establish patient communication protocols
• Begin regular performance monitoring

Months 7-12: Optimization and Scaling

• Conduct the first comprehensive audit of the governance framework
• Refine policies based on lessons learned
• Expand AI initiatives under governance oversight
• Develop a long-term strategic AI plan

The Business Case: Why This Matters Beyond Ethics

Healthcare organizations that implement comprehensive AI governance frameworks see measurable benefits:

• Risk Reduction: Companies with robust AI ethics frameworks report 67% reduction in compliance costs and average savings of $12.4M from prevented incidents
• Trust Building: Organizations with ethical AI governance experience 340% higher stakeholder trust
• Innovation Acceleration: Clear governance frameworks enable 45% faster AI project approvals through established guidelines
• Competitive Advantage: Early adopters of ethical AI governance are positioning themselves as industry leaders

Looking Forward: The Future of Ethical AI in Healthcare

As AI technology continues to evolve rapidly, healthcare organizations must balance innovation with responsibility. The principles of Beneficence, Respect for Persons, and Justice provide timeless guidance, but their implementation must adapt to new technologies and emerging challenges.

The STRIDE framework offers a practical, scalable approach that grows with your organization's AI maturity. By embedding ethical considerations into governance structures from the beginning, healthcare organizations can harness AI's transformative potential while maintaining the trust that is fundamental to the healing relationship.

The Choice is Clear: Organizations can either build ethical considerations into their AI initiatives proactively, or they can address ethical failures reactively. The former builds competitive advantage; the latter threatens organizational survival.

The patients we serve deserve nothing less than AI systems that honor their dignity, protect their well-being, and treat them fairly. By implementing comprehensive ethical governance frameworks, we ensure that AI becomes a force that strengthens, rather than undermines, the sacred trust between patients and their healthcare providers.

This concludes our four-part series on The Patient's AI Bill of Rights. What challenges does your organization face in implementing ethical AI governance? What frameworks have you found most helpful in balancing innovation with ethical responsibility? Share your experiences and questions in the comments below.

References

1. Abujaber, A.A. & Nashwan, A.J. (2024). Ethical framework for artificial intelligence in healthcare research: A path to integrity. World Journal of Methodology, 14(3), 94071.
2. Pham, T. (2025). Ethical and legal considerations in healthcare AI: innovation and policy for safe and fair use. Royal Society Open Science, 12(5), 241873.
3. World Health Organization. (2024). WHO releases AI ethics and governance guidance for large multi-modal models. Geneva: WHO Press.
4. Sheppard Mullin Healthcare Law Blog. (2024). Key Elements of an AI Governance Program in Healthcare. Healthcare Law Blog, August 29, 2024.
5. Reddy, S., Allan, S., Coghlan, S. & Cooper, P. (2025). Establishing organizational AI governance in healthcare: a case study in Canada. npj Digital Medicine, 8, Article 109.
6. American Medical Association. (2024). As they push ahead with AI, health leaders must set rules on use. AMA News, April 29, 2024.
7. HITRUST Alliance. (2023). Ethics of AI in Healthcare and Medicine. HITRUST Resource Center.
8. Axis Intelligence. (2025). Business AI Ethics Framework 2025: The $500M Implementation Blueprint That Stops AI Disasters. Axis Intelligence Research Report.
9. Kim, J.Y., Hasan, A., Balu, S. & Sendak, M. (2024). People, process, technology, and operations (PPTO) framework for organizational AI governance in healthcare. npj Digital Medicine, 7, 158.
10. Dankwa-Mullan, I. (2024). Health Equity and Ethical Considerations in Using Artificial Intelligence in Public Health and Medicine. Preventing Chronic Disease, 21:240245.